The student news site of the University of Northern Iowa

Northern Iowan

Last year’s election brings rules review

Jamison+Whiting%2C+left%2C+and+Aaron+Friel%2C+right%2C+ran+in+last+year%27s+NISG+presidential+election.+The+last+election+brought+up+issues+that+were+addressed+in+amendments.+
Jamison Whiting, left, and Aaron Friel, right, ran in last year's NISG presidential election. The last election brought up issues that were addressed in amendments.

Jamison Whiting, left, and Aaron Friel, right, ran in last year's NISG presidential election. The last election brought up issues that were addressed in amendments.

Courtesy Photo

Courtesy Photo

Jamison Whiting, left, and Aaron Friel, right, ran in last year's NISG presidential election. The last election brought up issues that were addressed in amendments.

JACOB MADDEN, News Editor

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.


Email This Story






Each year UNI students elect new representatives to the Northern Iowa Student Government (NISG). These students decide funding for student organizations and represent students in both internal and external affairs. This year the NISG campaigning will begin on Feb. 6 at 8 a.m. with a revised set of rules after last year’s NISG presidential election yielded election day allegations and caused a five-hour discussion of sanctions.

“Our purpose with the Supreme Court this year was to […] close those loopholes,” said Jamison Whiting, the student advisor to the Supreme Court this year and member of the Election Commission. Whiting ran for the office of NISG president last year with Aaron Friel, opposed by Hunter Flesch and Avery Johnson. According to Whiting, a lot of the amendments to the rules stemmed from allegations and actions taken by both tickets in last year’s presidential campaign.

“If it doesn’t blatantly say it’s against the rules, technically you can do it,” Whiting said. “Going back […] we started to close down those things that did happen last year.”

According to Benjamin Dzaboff, the chair of the Election Commission and associate justice of the NISG Supreme Court, one of the revisions the Supreme Court worked on extensively was clarifying the difference between the Supreme Court and the Election Commission.

The Supreme Court and the Election Commission are two separate entities according to Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and junior political science major Maggie Miller. Dzaboff said that unifying the wording between the Election Commission and the Supreme Court provides a lot of clarity for the role each serves in respect to the election.

“We added a clause about delaying election results because last year [the Supreme Court] debated for five hours,” Dzaboff said. “So we added, in [the election rules], that if there was a discrepancy that we can reserve two more hours or something to figure it out.”

Whiting explained that the reason the debate took so long last year is because the sanctions that were being considered for his ticket were not included in the election rules.

“The sanctions that were going to be imposed on us were sanctions that were made up […] that weren’t on the list of sanctions,” Whiting said. Sanctions are the penalties the commission levies against campaigns for campaign violations.

According to the election rules, violations range from placing campaign materials in offices of student organizations to vandalizing the campaign materials of an opponent. Violations can be met with sanctions from a warning to the nullification of the election entirely in the most extreme cases.

According to Miller, the circumstances surrounding last year’s election are what inspired the numerous revisions and full review of the election rules.

“I decided in that moment, in these five hours of all of us yelling at each other and being frustrated and unprepared, that I was not going to let that happen again,” Miller said. “So that’s the attitude I had going into changing the election rules this year.”

Miller explained that her goal is to keep the rules from being distorted or taken advantage of by campaigns and to make the election go as smooth as possible.

With the election on the horizon, campaign teams have begun to file for their official student organizations. According to NI records, Jamal White and Tristan Bernhard have established an exploratory committee — this is a practice that equates to announcing candidacy for NISG President and Vice President. Election results forbid a ticket from directly announcing candidacy until the first day of formal campaigning.

According to NISG Senate meeting minutes, Miller and Danielle Massey have also established an exploratory committee. Official announcements of candidacy traditionally occur on the first day of official campaigning and polls will open on Feb. 21.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Comment

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.




Navigate Right
Navigate Left
  • Last year’s election brings rules review

    News

    Study Abroad Fair

  • Last year’s election brings rules review

    News

    Nook’s State of the University Address

  • Last year’s election brings rules review

    News

    Candidate talks about abolishing BOR

  • Last year’s election brings rules review

    News

    Mohair Pear’s 7th Annual Pear Fair

  • Last year’s election brings rules review

    News

    A Greek tradition reignited

  • Last year’s election brings rules review

    News

    Assault advocacy office comes to campus

  • Last year’s election brings rules review

    News

    The Storm Lake Times: A tale of how a small Iowa paper received a Pulitzer

  • Last year’s election brings rules review

    News

    Six-game soccer win streak comes to an end

  • Last year’s election brings rules review

    News

    UNI-CUE helps ‘Discover the Dream’

  • Last year’s election brings rules review

    News

    CP lots cause tension on north side of campus

The student news site of the University of Northern Iowa
Last year’s election brings rules review